Claude Opus 4.1 profile

    Claude Opus 4.1 — security & risk dashboard

    Known weaknesses, safety and security advisories, and documented real-world incidents for Claude Opus 4.1 — collected automatically and re-checked every few hours, so teams building on it can see what to design around.

    Last checked 20 Oct 2026

    Ask the Advisor about this model
    Known flaws

    4

    Security risks

    3

    Real-world incidents

    0

    Advisories logged

    0

    Security, safety & abuse risks

    • Coding and tool-use capabilities can be abused to support data theft and extortion, as documented in Anthropic’s reporting on Claude Code misuse.
    • Broad access to sensitive files and external tools can increase the impact of malicious or unauthorized workflows.
    • Automated analysis of stolen information and generation of personalized extortion demands can increase the scale of criminal operations.

    Known flaws & limitations

    • The documented context window is 200K tokens.
    • The documented maximum output is 32K tokens.
    • Native audio and video input are not supported.
    • The published SWE-bench Verified result does not establish reliable completion of every software-engineering task.

    Security advisories & risk updates

    No risk advisories logged since this profile started being tracked. New ones appear here automatically.

    What this means if you are building on it

    • Applications requiring native audio or video understanding.
    • Tasks requiring more than 200K tokens in one context or more than 32K output tokens.
    • Unsupervised operations involving sensitive data, production systems or irreversible actions.

    Everything here comes from published documentation, advisories and reporting, with links to the original sources. It is not a complete vulnerability database — always check the provider's own security notices before shipping.