AI Progress Tracker
77from 8
benchmarks
benchmarks
This profile covers the Claude Opus 4.7 model designation attributed to Anthropic. Not yet confirmed by public reporting.
context: 1Mtextimagefile$5.00 / $25 per 1M tokens (in / out)
Benchmark results
Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 90.2%17 Apr 2026 | View |
| SWE-bench VerifiedResolving real GitHub issues | 83.5%20 Apr 2026 | View |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics | 97.8%17 Apr 2026 | View |
| Terminal-BenchLong-horizon command-line agent tasks | 80.2%16 Apr 2026 | View |
| FrontierMath | 43.8%17 Apr 2026 | View |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions (hallucination resistance) | 51.7%27 Aug 2026 | View |
| LMArena TextHuman preference Elo from blind chat votes (not a percentage) | 1490 Elo22 Oct 2026 | View |
| LMArena WebDevHuman preference Elo for building web apps (not a percentage) | 1558 Elo23 Oct 2026 | View |
Weighted mean of 6 verified benchmark results: GPQA Diamond 90.2%, SWE-bench Verified 83.5%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 97.8%, Terminal-Bench 80.2%, FrontierMath 43.8%, SimpleQA Verified 51.7%.
Profile last reviewed 10/27/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.