DeepSeek V3 · DeepSeek-V3 (original December 2024 release)
DeepSeek · 26 Dec 2024
benchmarks
DeepSeek-V3 is an open-weight, text-generation model with 671 billion total parameters, approximately 37 billion activated per token, and a documented 128K-token context window. Later releases, including DeepSeek-V3.2, supersede this generation; the specifications and benchmark results here describe the original December 2024 model.
Benchmark results
Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AIMECompetition mathematics | 39.2%Dec 2024 | View |
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 59.1%Dec 2024 | View |
| MMLU-ProBroad expert knowledge and reasoning | 75.9%Dec 2024 | View |
| SWE-bench VerifiedResolving real GitHub issues | 42%Dec 2024 | View |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics | 37.8%1 Apr 2025 | View |
| FrontierMath | 1.7%7 Mar 2025 | View |
| MATH Level 5 | 75.5%1 Apr 2025 | View |
| LMArena TextHuman preference Elo from blind chat votes (not a percentage) | 1375 Elo22 Oct 2026 | View |
| Aider PolyglotCode editing across six programming languages | 70.2%3 Oct 2025 | View |
| LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive-programming problems | 49.6%1 May 2025 | View |
Weighted mean of 9 verified benchmark results: AIME 39.2%, GPQA Diamond 59.1%, MMLU-Pro 75.9%, SWE-bench Verified 42%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 37.8%, FrontierMath 1.7%, MATH Level 5 75.5%, Aider Polyglot 70.2%, LiveCodeBench 49.6%.
Capabilities
- General-purpose text generation, instruction following and question answering.
- Multilingual language processing, with published English and Chinese evaluations.
- Code generation, code editing and software-repair assistance.
- Mathematical and scientific problem solving, supported by published benchmark evaluations.
- Long-document processing within a documented 128K-token context window.
- Downloadable weights for self-hosting and infrastructure-level customization.
What improved
- Higher MMLU-Pro and GPQA Diamond results than DeepSeek-V2.5 in the vendor's evaluations.
- Higher AIME 2024 and MATH-500 results than DeepSeek-V2.5.
- Higher LiveCodeBench and SWE-bench Verified results than DeepSeek-V2.5.
- Introduces auxiliary-loss-free expert load balancing to reduce interference between load balancing and model performance.
- Adds a multi-token prediction training objective and uses FP8 mixed-precision training.
Known flaws & limitations
- The original model is text-only; native image, audio and video understanding are not documented capabilities.
- Published mathematics, science and software-repair evaluations show substantial remaining error rates.
- Self-hosting the complete model requires substantial memory and infrastructure despite sparse parameter activation.
- The technical report identifies deployment efficiency and inference speed as areas requiring further improvement.
Risks, safety & security issues
- Incorrect answers can cause downstream harm when used for consequential decisions without independent validation.
- Generated code and software patches require testing and security review; benchmark performance does not establish production safety.
- A documented database exposure at DeepSeek's hosted service demonstrates the importance of protecting prompts, conversation logs and credentials; it was not an established vulnerability in V3's weights.
Good fit for
- Human-reviewed coding, debugging and software-maintenance assistance.
- English and Chinese drafting, summarization and question answering.
- Long-document analysis with independent checks of important claims.
- Self-hosted text applications operated by teams with substantial inference infrastructure.
Poor fit for
- Native image, audio or video understanding.
- Unsupervised high-stakes decisions or unattended production-code deployment.
- Full-model deployment on memory-constrained consumer hardware.
- Processing sensitive information through services without appropriate retention and access controls.
References
Profile last reviewed 10/27/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.