benchmarks
DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B is an open-weight, text-only reasoning model built on Qwen3-8B using reasoning data from DeepSeek-R1-0528. Its published evaluations demonstrate mathematics, science and coding capabilities, while its compact size supports self-hosted deployment.
Benchmark results
Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AIMECompetition mathematics | 86%May 2025 | View |
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 61.1%May 2025 | View |
| LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive-programming problems | 60.5%May 2025 | View |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics | 43.9%28 Aug 2026 | View |
Weighted mean of 4 verified benchmark results: AIME 86%, GPQA Diamond 61.1%, LiveCodeBench 60.5%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 43.9%.
Capabilities
- Solves competition-style mathematics problems using extended reasoning.
- Answers challenging scientific questions, with published GPQA Diamond results.
- Generates solutions to programming problems, with published LiveCodeBench results.
- Provides downloadable weights for local deployment and customization.
- Supports deployment through inference frameworks including vLLM and SGLang.
What improved
- Uses Qwen3-8B rather than the Qwen2.5-Math backbone of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B.
- Learns from reasoning data generated by the updated DeepSeek-R1-0528 teacher.
- Reports higher AIME 2024 performance than DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B.
- Reports higher GPQA Diamond and LiveCodeBench performance than DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B.
Known flaws & limitations
- Text-only model; it does not natively process images, audio or video.
- Published mathematics, science and coding evaluations show that answers are not consistently correct.
- DeepSeek warns that greedy decoding can cause endless repetition.
- The model can bypass its thinking pattern; DeepSeek recommends explicitly starting generation with the thinking prefix.
Risks, safety & security issues
- Incorrect scientific answers or generated code can cause downstream harm when used without independent validation.
- Repetitive or lengthy reasoning can consume substantial inference resources; deployments should enforce token and execution limits.
- Hosted deployments can expose sensitive conversations if logging databases and credentials are inadequately protected; this is a deployment risk, not an established checkpoint vulnerability.
Good fit for
- Self-hosted mathematics and reasoning assistance with answer checking.
- Programming assistance backed by automated tests and code review.
- Research into reasoning distillation and compact language models.
- Text-based scientific question answering with expert verification.
Poor fit for
- Image, audio or video understanding without separate modality-processing components.
- Unsupervised medical, legal or other high-stakes decision-making.
- Executing generated code directly in privileged production environments.
- Applications requiring consistently short, tightly bounded response latency.
References
Profile last reviewed 10/21/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.