Gemini 3 Pro · Gemini 3 Pro Preview (last recorded; current status unverified)
Google · 18 Nov 2025
benchmarks
Gemini 3 Pro launched in preview as Google's multimodal reasoning model for complex questions, software development and tool-assisted workflows. Current availability, lifecycle status and pricing: Not yet confirmed by public reporting.
Benchmark results
Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2Novel abstract reasoning puzzles | 31.1%November 2025; vendor launch evaluation | View |
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 91.9%November 2025; vendor launch evaluation | View |
| Humanity's Last ExamFrontier expert questions across fields | 37.5%November 2025; vendor launch evaluation, | View |
| SWE-bench VerifiedResolving real GitHub issues | 76.2%November 2025; vendor launch evaluation | View |
| Terminal-BenchLong-horizon command-line agent tasks | 54.2%November 2025; vendor launch evaluation | View |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics | 91.4%19 Nov 2025 | View |
| FrontierMath | 37.6%21 Nov 2025 | View |
| LMArena TextHuman preference Elo from blind chat votes (not a percentage) | 1479 Elo22 Oct 2026 | View |
| LMArena WebDevHuman preference Elo for building web apps (not a percentage) | 1440 Elo23 Oct 2026 | View |
Weighted mean of 7 verified benchmark results: ARC-AGI-2 31.1%, GPQA Diamond 91.9%, Humanity's Last Exam 37.5%, SWE-bench Verified 76.2%, Terminal-Bench 54.2%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 91.4%, FrontierMath 37.6%.
Capabilities
- Multimodal reasoning across text, images, video and audio.
- Analysis of large documents and other long-context inputs.
- Advanced scientific question answering, supported by the published GPQA Diamond evaluation.
- Code generation and repository-level software engineering with agent tooling.
- Tool-assisted workflows involving planning and terminal interaction.
What improved
- Google's launch evaluation reports higher GPQA Diamond performance than Gemini 2.5 Pro.
- Google's launch evaluation reports higher SWE-bench Verified performance than Gemini 2.5 Pro.
- Google's launch evaluation reports higher Humanity's Last Exam performance without tools than Gemini 2.5 Pro.
- Google describes stronger multimodal reasoning than Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Known flaws & limitations
- The launch Humanity's Last Exam result without tools leaves most questions unsolved.
- The published software-engineering and terminal evaluations show substantial remaining task failures.
- Benchmark results depend on evaluation settings and agent scaffolding; they do not establish reliability in arbitrary deployments.
- The maximum context window does not establish dependable retrieval or reasoning across every part of an input.
Risks, safety & security issues
- Incorrect answers or generated code can cause downstream harm when accepted without independent validation.
- Tool-enabled deployments can amplify mistakes unless permissions, execution environments and consequential actions are constrained.
- Sensitive long-context inputs require data minimization, access controls and explicit retention policies.
- Malicious packages marketed to AI-tool users can compromise host systems independently of the model's safeguards.
Good fit for
- Assisted scientific and technical research with source checking.
- Software development with automated tests and human code review.
- Multimodal document and media analysis.
- Supervised agent workflows in restricted execution environments.
Poor fit for
- Unsupervised high-stakes decisions requiring reliably correct answers.
- Autonomous execution with unrestricted credentials or production-system access.
- Workflows requiring guaranteed exhaustive understanding of very long inputs.
References
Profile last reviewed 10/27/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.