GPT-5.2 profile
GPT-5.2 — security & risk dashboard
Known weaknesses, safety and security advisories, and documented real-world incidents for GPT-5.2 — collected automatically and re-checked every few hours, so teams building on it can see what to design around.
Last checked 16 Oct 2026
Known flaws
3
Security risks
4
Real-world incidents
0
Advisories logged
0
Security, safety & abuse risks
- Untrusted documents, web pages, and tool responses can introduce prompt-injection risks in connected applications.
- Incorrect tool calls can cause consequential changes when applications grant broad permissions.
- Sensitive information can be exposed through poorly scoped retrieval, tools, or application logging.
- Confidently expressed errors can mislead users when outputs are accepted without independent validation.
Known flaws & limitations
- Can still generate incorrect facts, reasoning, or code.
- Thinking benchmark results do not establish equivalent performance for Instant, Pro, or every API reasoning setting.
- Complex reasoning can increase latency and billed output-token consumption.
Security advisories & risk updates
No risk advisories logged since this profile started being tracked. New ones appear here automatically.
What this means if you are building on it
- Unsupervised high-stakes medical, legal, or financial decisions.
- Autonomous destructive actions or unrestricted access to sensitive systems.
- Applications requiring guaranteed factual accuracy or exhaustive recall.
- Latency-sensitive tasks where extensive reasoning is unnecessary.
Everything here comes from published documentation, advisories and reporting, with links to the original sources. It is not a complete vulnerability database — always check the provider's own security notices before shipping.