AI Progress Tracker

    Granite 4.0 Micro · granite-4.0-micro

    2 Oct 2025

    Ask the Advisor about this model
    18from 2
    benchmarks

    IBM Granite 4.0 Micro is a 3-billion-parameter, text-only instruction model available under the Apache 2.0 license, with a 131,072-token context window. It is designed for enterprise language tasks, including retrieval-augmented generation, summarization, information extraction and tool calling.

    context: 131Ktext

    Benchmark results

    Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.

    BenchmarkScoreSource
    GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions28.3%30 Aug 2026View
    OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics2.8%30 Aug 2026View

    Weighted mean of 2 verified benchmark results: GPQA Diamond 28.3%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 2.8%.

    Capabilities

    • Retrieval-augmented question answering over supplied documents.
    • Text summarization and information extraction.
    • Text classification and instruction-following workflows.
    • Tool calling for integration with external functions.
    • Multilingual text processing.
    • Open-weight deployment and customization under Apache 2.0.

    What improved

    • Not yet confirmed by public reporting.

    Known flaws & limitations

    • Text-only input and output; it does not provide native image, audio or video understanding.
    • Generated answers can contain factual errors or fabricated information.
    • Performance varies by task, language and deployment conditions; application-specific evaluation remains necessary.

    Risks, safety & security issues

    • Incorrect or fabricated answers can mislead users when treated as authoritative.
    • Generated text can reproduce biases present in training data.
    • Harmful or inappropriate responses remain possible; deployments require application-level safeguards.

    Good fit for

    • Document question answering grounded in retrieved sources.
    • Business-text summarization, classification and information extraction.
    • Tool-assisted workflows with validated arguments and restricted permissions.
    • Locally hosted text applications requiring open weights and deployment control.

    Poor fit for

    • Native image, audio or video understanding.
    • High-stakes decisions without qualified human review.
    • Factual answering that requires guaranteed accuracy without source verification.
    • Unsupervised execution of consequential actions.

    Profile last reviewed 10/21/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.