Kimi K2.5 profile

    Kimi K2.5 — security & risk dashboard

    Known weaknesses, safety and security advisories, and documented real-world incidents for Kimi K2.5 — collected automatically and re-checked every few hours, so teams building on it can see what to design around.

    Last checked 27 Oct 2026

    Ask the Advisor about this model
    Known flaws

    4

    Security risks

    4

    Real-world incidents

    0

    Advisories logged

    0

    Security, safety & abuse risks

    • Incorrect tool actions can affect connected systems; deployments should restrict permissions and require approval for consequential operations.
    • Generated code and shell commands can introduce security defects; review and sandbox execution remain important.
    • Long-context and multimodal workflows can expose sensitive material unless access, retention and disclosure controls are enforced.
    • Parallel agents can propagate erroneous assumptions across subtasks; consequential outputs need independent validation.

    Known flaws & limitations

    • Humanity’s Last Exam results indicate substantial remaining limitations on difficult expert-level questions, including with tools.
    • Software-repair and terminal-task evaluations show incomplete reliability; generated changes still require testing and review.
    • Full-weight self-hosting is resource-intensive because the mixture-of-experts architecture contains approximately one trillion total parameters.
    • Published agent results depend on tool access and evaluation scaffolding, not model weights alone.

    Security advisories & risk updates

    No risk advisories logged since this profile started being tracked. New ones appear here automatically.

    What this means if you are building on it

    • Unsupervised consequential actions on production systems.
    • High-stakes expert decisions without independent verification.
    • Full-weight deployment on resource-constrained hardware.
    • Sensitive-data workflows without explicit access and retention controls.

    Everything here comes from published documentation, advisories and reporting, with links to the original sources. It is not a complete vulnerability database — always check the provider's own security notices before shipping.