benchmarks
Kimi K3 is named in reporting about agent-assisted Redis vulnerability discovery and authenticated remote-code-execution proof-of-concept development. Its release date, context window, API pricing and benchmark results are not yet confirmed by public reporting.
Benchmark results
Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 93.1%16 Jul 2026 | View |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics | 97.2%16 Jul 2026 | View |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions (hallucination resistance) | 50.6%27 Aug 2026 | View |
| LMArena TextHuman preference Elo from blind chat votes (not a percentage) | 1475 Elo22 Oct 2026 | View |
| LMArena WebDevHuman preference Elo for building web apps (not a percentage) | 1655 Elo23 Oct 2026 | View |
Weighted mean of 3 verified benchmark results: GPQA Diamond 93.1%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 97.2%, SimpleQA Verified 50.6%.
Capabilities
- Reported agent-assisted discovery of Redis vulnerabilities.
- Reported assistance constructing authenticated remote-code-execution proofs of concept.
- Reported security research covering multiple Redis versions.
- Reported development of exploit chains requiring specific Redis command permissions.
What improved
- Not yet confirmed by public reporting.
Known flaws & limitations
- Not yet confirmed by public reporting.
Risks, safety & security issues
- Reported assistance with working exploit construction illustrates the dual-use risk of security agents.
- The reported Redis exploit chains require authentication and RESTORE permissions; they should not be characterized as unauthenticated attacks.
- The Redis findings do not establish a vulnerability in Kimi K3 or other Kimi models.
Good fit for
- Evaluating agent-assisted vulnerability research in authorized test environments.
- Human-reviewed security analysis with tightly scoped permissions.
- Studying exploit-development assistance in isolated security laboratories.
Poor fit for
- Unsupervised security operations against production systems.
- Deployments requiring established context limits, pricing or independently documented benchmark performance.
References
Profile last reviewed 10/27/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.