Llama 4 profile
Llama 4 — security & risk dashboard
Known weaknesses, safety and security advisories, and documented real-world incidents for Llama 4 — collected automatically and re-checked every few hours, so teams building on it can see what to design around.
Last checked 20 Oct 2026
Known flaws
5
Security risks
4
Real-world incidents
0
Advisories logged
0
Security, safety & abuse risks
- Outputs can be inaccurate or fabricated; consequential factual claims require independent verification.
- Safety tuning does not guarantee prevention of harmful outputs, jailbreaks or instruction-following failures.
- Self-hosted deployments require application-specific safeguards, security testing and abuse monitoring.
- Connecting the model to tools or confidential data requires independent access controls and validation of model-generated actions.
Known flaws & limitations
- Performance and safety outside the twelve explicitly supported languages require additional validation.
- Sparse activation does not eliminate storage and memory requirements for approximately 109B total Scout parameters or 400B Maverick parameters.
- The custom license restricts use and distribution, including multimodal-model grants to EU-based individuals and companies, with an end-user exception.
- Generates text rather than native audio, video or image outputs.
- The documented context window is a capacity specification, not a guarantee of reliable retrieval or reasoning across every token.
Security advisories & risk updates
No risk advisories logged since this profile started being tracked. New ones appear here automatically.
What this means if you are building on it
- Unsupervised medical, legal, financial or other consequential decision-making.
- Applications requiring native image, audio or video generation.
- Deployments requiring guaranteed factual accuracy or reliable reasoning across every token of the maximum context.
- Resource-constrained deployments that cannot accommodate the full model weights and context-related memory demands.
Everything here comes from published documentation, advisories and reporting, with links to the original sources. It is not a complete vulnerability database — always check the provider's own security notices before shipping.