Mistral Medium · Mistral Medium 3 (mistral-medium-2505)
Mistral · 7 May 2025
benchmarks
Mistral Medium 3 is a proprietary multimodal model with text-and-image input, text output, and a 128,000-token context window, positioned for enterprise tasks including coding and document analysis. Mistral Medium 3.1 subsequently shipped; this profile remains specific to the May 2025 mistral-medium-2505 release.
Benchmark results
Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 59.5%7 May 2025 | View |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics | 32.2%7 May 2025 | View |
| FrontierMath | 0.3%7 May 2025 | View |
| MATH Level 5 | 81.6%7 May 2025 | View |
| LMArena TextHuman preference Elo from blind chat votes (not a percentage) | 1424 Elo15 Oct 2026 | View |
Weighted mean of 4 verified benchmark results: GPQA Diamond 59.5%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 32.2%, FrontierMath 0.3%, MATH Level 5 81.6%.
Capabilities
- Understands text and image inputs within a shared conversation.
- Supports code generation and software-development assistance.
- Processes long documents within its 128,000-token context window.
- Supports function calling for integration with external tools.
- Supports structured output for application workflows.
What improved
- Adds image understanding compared with the original text-only Mistral Medium.
- Expands the context window from the original Medium model's 32,000 tokens to 128,000 tokens.
- Introduces lower published API prices than the original Mistral Medium: $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens.
Known flaws & limitations
- Model weights are not publicly released under an open-weight licence.
- Native audio input and audio generation are outside its documented text-and-image interface.
- Produces text rather than native image output.
Risks, safety & security issues
- Not yet confirmed by public reporting.
Good fit for
- Enterprise assistants working with text and image-based documents.
- Coding assistance and software-development workflows.
- Long-document summarisation and information extraction.
- Tool-connected applications requiring structured text output.
Poor fit for
- Applications requiring publicly available open weights.
- Native speech-to-speech or audio-generation applications.
- Native image-generation applications.
- Tasks requiring more than 128,000 tokens in a single context.
References
Profile last reviewed 10/18/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.