Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking · Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Alibaba · 25 Jul 2025
benchmarks
Alibaba's Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is an open-weight, text-only reasoning model with 235 billion total parameters and 22 billion activated per token. This thinking-only checkpoint supports a native 262,144-token context and publishes vendor evaluations covering mathematics, scientific reasoning, coding and general knowledge.
Benchmark results
Every figure links to where it was published. Compare like with like — harnesses and prompt setups differ between vendors.
| Benchmark | Score | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AIMECompetition mathematics | 92.3%Jul 2025 | View |
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 81.1%Jul 2025 | View |
| Humanity's Last ExamFrontier expert questions across fields | 18.2%Jul 2025 | View |
| LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive-programming problems | 74.1%Jul 2025 | View |
| MMLU-ProBroad expert knowledge and reasoning | 84.4%Jul 2025 | View |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25Competition mathematics | 86.7%10 Dec 2025 | View |
| FrontierMath | 8.5%11 Dec 2025 | View |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions (hallucination resistance) | 40.4%27 Aug 2026 | View |
Weighted mean of 8 verified benchmark results: AIME 92.3%, GPQA Diamond 81.1%, Humanity's Last Exam 18.2%, LiveCodeBench 74.1%, MMLU-Pro 84.4%, OTIS Mock AIME 2024-25 86.7%, FrontierMath 8.5%, SimpleQA Verified 40.4%.
Capabilities
- Multi-step mathematical reasoning, supported by published competition-mathematics evaluations.
- Scientific question answering, evaluated on GPQA Diamond.
- Code generation and algorithmic problem solving, evaluated on LiveCodeBench v6.
- Long-document processing within a native 262,144-token context window.
- Open-weight deployment with a mixture-of-experts architecture that activates 22 billion parameters per token.
What improved
- Native context expands from the original checkpoint's 32,768 tokens to 262,144 tokens.
- Vendor evaluations report stronger mathematical and scientific reasoning than the original Qwen3-235B-A22B.
- Vendor evaluations report improved coding performance over the original checkpoint.
- A dedicated thinking-only configuration replaces the predecessor's switchable thinking and non-thinking modes.
Known flaws & limitations
- Text-only: it does not natively process images, audio or video.
- This checkpoint does not support switching to a non-thinking mode.
- Self-hosting must accommodate 235 billion total parameters despite the smaller active parameter count.
- Its published Humanity's Last Exam result shows substantial remaining limitations on exceptionally difficult expert questions.
Risks, safety & security issues
- Not yet confirmed by public reporting.
Good fit for
- Mathematical and scientific problem solving with independently checked answers.
- Programming assistance and algorithmic tasks backed by executable tests.
- Long-document analysis and synthesis using text inputs.
- Self-hosted reasoning applications with substantial inference infrastructure.
Poor fit for
- Native image, audio or video understanding.
- Applications requiring a selectable non-thinking mode.
- Resource-constrained local deployment.
- Unsupervised high-stakes decisions requiring consistently correct expert answers.
References
Profile last reviewed 10/26/2026 and re-checked automatically every few hours against the vendor's published documentation, papers and public leaderboards. Scores come from the cited benchmark results above — confirm limits and pricing against the provider's own documentation before building on them.