AI Research

    GPQA Diamond is corrected to OpenAI's published 92.4% for GPT-5.2 Thinking

    The OnAirToday AI Progress Tracker corrected GPT-5.2 Thinking’s GPQA Diamond score to 92.4%, matching the figure in OpenAI’s published documentation.

    O

    OnAirToday

    Newsroom

    2 min
    OnAirToday

    The OnAirToday AI Progress Tracker recorded a verified change to OpenAI's GPT-5.2 (version gpt-5.2): GPQA Diamond is corrected to OpenAI's published 92.4% for GPT-5.2 Thinking.

    GPT-5.2 is an OpenAI model for reasoning, coding, visual understanding and tool-assisted work, with a documented 400,000-token context window. The benchmark figures below describe GPT-5.2 Thinking; standard API pricing is $1.75 per million input tokens and $14 per million output tokens.

    What changed in this review:

    • SWE-bench Verified is corrected to OpenAI's published 80.0% for GPT-5.2 Thinking.
    • Added published AIME 2025 and ARC-AGI-2 results for GPT-5.2 Thinking.
    • Other previously listed benchmark figures are not retained as confirmed results.
    • Sandbox-escape and Hugging Face breach reports are recorded separately at family level; neither establishes GPT-5.2 involvement.
    • Newer GPT-5-family releases include GPT-5.3-Codex; this profile remains specific to GPT-5.2.
    • Flaws and limitations updated

    Teams building on GPT-5.2 should confirm limits, pricing and benchmark coverage against the vendor's own documentation before relying on these figures.

    The full profile — capabilities, benchmark citations, known flaws and risk guidance — is on the tracker at /ai-models/gpt-5-2.

    References:

    • https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-2/
    • https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-5.2
    • https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-3-codex/
    • https://thehackernews.com/2026/07/openai-says-its-own-ai-models-escaped.html
    AI Analysis

    Generated insight by OnAirToday AI

    Correcting a benchmark score to match the published figure helps keep AI model comparisons accurate. It also makes the tracker’s data consistent with OpenAI’s documentation.

    Powered by AI • Not a substitute for human analysisMore Insights →
    Read the full story at OnAirToday →
    Share
    Filed under:AI Research

    Comments

    Keep comments relevant and respectful. No links, advertising, self-promotion, or spam.

    0/1000