AI Research

    GPT-5.1: added launch-reported SWE-bench Verified result; this is historical evidence, not a newly measured improvement

    Quantifying the performance legacy of GPT-5.1 through validated SWE-bench benchmarks.

    Added launch-reported SWE-bench Verified result; this is historical evidence, not a newly measured improvement — verified by the OnAirToday AI Progress Tracker against OpenAI's published documentation.

    O

    OnAirToday

    Newsroom

    OnAirToday
    GPT-5.1: added launch-reported SWE-bench Verified result; this is historical evidence, not a newly measured improvement

    The OnAirToday AI Progress Tracker recorded a verified change to OpenAI's GPT-5.1 (version gpt-5.1): Added launch-reported SWE-bench Verified result; this is historical evidence, not a newly measured improvement.

    GPT-5.1 is OpenAI's general-purpose reasoning model with text and image input, text output, configurable reasoning effort, and tool-calling support. This profile reflects launch-era documentation; without live source access, I cannot independently verify its September 2026 availability, pricing, or successor releases.

    What changed in this review:

    • Current availability, pricing, and successor releases remain unverified; prices are USD per million tokens for standard API input and output.

    Teams building on GPT-5.1 should confirm limits, pricing and benchmark coverage against the vendor's own documentation before relying on these figures.

    The full profile — capabilities, benchmark citations, known flaws and risk guidance — is on the tracker at /ai-models/gpt-5-1.

    References:

    • https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-1/
    • https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-1-for-developers/
    • https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-5.1
    AI Analysis

    Generated insight by OnAirToday AI

    The inclusion of historical SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.1 serves as a vital benchmark for evaluating the long-term evolution of autonomous coding capabilities. This documentation establishes a clearer trajectory for agentic performance, allowing researchers to distinguish between retroactive validation and genuine leaps in problem-solving efficacy.

    Powered by AI • Not a substitute for human analysisMore Insights →
    Read the full story at OnAirToday →
    Share
    Filed under:AI Research

    Comments

    Keep comments relevant and respectful. No links, advertising, self-promotion, or spam.

    0/1000