AI Research

    GPT-5-Mini: gPQA Diamond changes from 75% to OpenAI’s published 82.3%; this is a reporting correction, not evidence of a model upgrade

    The tracker updated GPT-5-Mini’s GPQA Diamond figure to match OpenAI documentation.

    GPQA Diamond changes from 75% to OpenAI’s published 82.3%; this is a reporting correction, not evidence of a model upgrade — verified by the OnAirToday AI Progress Tracker against OpenAI's published documentation.

    O

    OnAirToday

    Newsroom

    2 min
    OnAirToday

    The OnAirToday AI Progress Tracker recorded a verified change to OpenAI's GPT-5-Mini (version gpt-5-mini): GPQA Diamond changes from 75% to OpenAI’s published 82.3%; this is a reporting correction, not evidence of a model upgrade.

    GPT-5 mini is OpenAI’s smaller GPT-5 reasoning model for well-defined tasks, accepting text and image inputs and producing text outputs. It supports a 400,000-token context window, up to 128,000 output tokens, and standard API pricing of $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens.

    What changed in this review:

    • SWE-bench Verified changes from 64.7% to OpenAI’s published 71.0%; evaluation configurations may differ.
    • Adds OpenAI’s published AIME 2025 result of 91.1% and MMMU result of 81.6%.
    • Flaws and limitations updated
    • Risks and threats updated

    Teams building on GPT-5-Mini should confirm limits, pricing and benchmark coverage against the vendor's own documentation before relying on these figures.

    The full profile — capabilities, benchmark citations, known flaws and risk guidance — is on the tracker at /ai-models/gpt-5-mini.

    References:

    • https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-5-mini
    • https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-for-developers/
    • https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-4o-mini
    • https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/reasoning
    AI Analysis

    Generated insight by OnAirToday AI

    Correcting the reported score distinguishes updated documentation from an actual change in model capability. It also highlights why benchmark figures should be checked against their published sources.

    Powered by AI • Not a substitute for human analysisMore Insights →
    Read the full story at OnAirToday →
    Share
    Filed under:AI Research

    Comments

    Keep comments relevant and respectful. No links, advertising, self-promotion, or spam.

    0/1000